fd86e6d636
This code is supposed to allow depends_on "foo" => "with-bar" to work when foo has only a "without-bar" option. The options system was not designed to support this. Unfortunately, it was bolted on anyway. The implementation is extremely difficult to understand, and it only works for certain types of options, which is confusing from a user's point of view. Luckily, no formulae in core or the official taps rely on the behavior in order to function. It is hindering progress in improving this code, so I am removing it.
58 lines
1.3 KiB
Ruby
58 lines
1.3 KiB
Ruby
require 'testing_env'
|
|
require 'build_options'
|
|
|
|
class BuildOptionsTests < Homebrew::TestCase
|
|
def setup
|
|
args = %w{--with-foo --with-bar --without-qux}
|
|
@build = BuildOptions.new(args)
|
|
@build.add("with-foo")
|
|
@build.add("with-bar")
|
|
@build.add("without-baz")
|
|
@build.add("without-qux")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_as_flags
|
|
assert_equal %w{--with-foo --with-bar --without-baz --without-qux}.sort,
|
|
@build.as_flags.sort
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_has_option?
|
|
assert @build.has_option?("with-foo")
|
|
assert !@build.has_option?("with-qux")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_include
|
|
assert_includes @build, "with-foo"
|
|
refute_includes @build, "with-qux"
|
|
refute_includes @build, "--with-foo"
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_with_without
|
|
assert @build.with?("foo")
|
|
assert @build.with?("bar")
|
|
assert @build.with?("baz")
|
|
assert @build.without?("qux")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_used_options
|
|
assert_includes @build.used_options, "--with-foo"
|
|
assert_includes @build.used_options, "--with-bar"
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_unused_options
|
|
assert_includes @build.unused_options, "--without-baz"
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_copies_do_not_share_underlying_options
|
|
orig = BuildOptions.new []
|
|
copy = orig.dup
|
|
refute_same orig.args, copy.args
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_copies_do_not_share_underlying_args
|
|
orig = BuildOptions.new []
|
|
copy = orig.dup
|
|
refute_same orig.args, copy.args
|
|
end
|
|
end
|