- I found a few occurrences of this pattern from
https://github.com/orgs/Homebrew/projects/5?pane=issue&itemId=97021840,
that is an automated style request for:
`core: use / instead of + operator in e.g. (lib+"lv").install "lv.hlp"`.
- Upon adding tests I realised that there's also the `prefix + "bin"`
case that's already handled differently, so let's combine the handling
given it's the same `+` that's wrong.
Add a new RuboCop to detect the use of 0.0.0.0 in formulae which
indicates binding to all network interfaces, internally or externally,
so is a bad default and potentially a security risk.
Co-authored-by: Issy Long <me@issylong.com>
Inspired by curl's blog post, [Detecting malicious Unicode][1], this likely captures most if not all cases and nudges the user toward supplying IDNs with punycode.
A possible improvement would be telling the user exactly what punycode domain to use instead, but that may require another library as I can't quickly find something built into the Ruby stdlib that handles punycode encoding.
[1]: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2025/05/16/detecting-malicious-unicode/
Co-authored-by: Štefan Baebler <319826+stefanb@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this change, `brew bottle` would add the `:arm64_linux` bottle
lines last. This would make `brew style` complain because it wants the
`arm64_*` bottles listed first.
Let's fix this by retaining the existing style as closely as possible:
- macOS bottles are listed first
- for each OS, arm64 bottles are listed first (just as we do on macOS)
In particular, `brew bottle` will now insert `:arm64_linux` bottle lines
just above the `:x86_64_linux` bottle lines (but still below the macOS
bottle lines).
x86_64 may continue to be a more popular platform on Linux for quite
some time. However, users looking for those bottles can continue to look
in the same place as before this change (i.e., the last line of the
bottle block). Taking this together with the consistency on macOS
mentioned above, I think this is the right way forward here.
For concreteness, here are some examples of bottle blocks before and after
this change.
Before this change, immediately after `brew bottle`:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
end
Before this change, after doing `brew style --fix`:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
end
After this change:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
end
- I considered writing a cop for this, but it's not worth it:
there are no `[:test, :build]` occurrences in Core and this
Rust rule only applies in Core formulae.
- Some of these I bumped to `typed: strict`, some of them I added
intermediary type signatures to some of the methods to make my life
easier in the (near, hopefully) future.
- Turns out that RuboCop node matchers that end in `?`
can return `nil` if they don't match anything, not `false`.
- These can be either BlockNode, SendNode or AsgnNode,
which are all a type of Node.
- This causes errors in other places because we call
BlockNode or SendNode methods on a Node now. Still TODO.
Formulae, casks, and resources have a `#livecheckable?` method that
indicates whether they contain a `livecheck` block. This is intended
to be read as "has a livecheckable?", not "is livecheckable?" (as
livecheck can find versions for some packages/resources without a
`livecheck` block). Unfortunately, correct understanding of this
method's behavior [outside of documentation] relies on historical
knowledge that few people possess, so this is often confusing to
anyone who hasn't been working on livecheck since 2020.
In the olden days, a "livecheckable" was a Ruby file containing a
`livecheck` block (originally a hash) with a filename that
corresponded to a related formula. The `livecheck` blocks in
livecheckable files were integrated into their respective formulae in
August 2020, so [first-party] livecheckables ceased to exist at that
time. From that point forward, we simply referred to these as
`livecheck` blocks.
With that in mind, this clarifies the situation by replacing
"livecheckable" language. This includes renaming `#livecheckable?` to
`#livecheck_defined?`, replacing usage of "livecheckable" as a noun
with "`livecheck` block", replacing "livecheckable" as a boolean with
"livecheck_defined", and replacing incorrect usage of "livecheckable"
as an adjective with "checkable".
