Making `channel` information available in the `Item` is necessary
to be able to filter out unstable items using a `strategy` block. If
an item doesn't specify a channel, then it uses the default channel
(this is what Sparkle itself uses for updates). Channels like `beta`
are something we want to avoid for stable casks and this allows for
that type of [cask-specific] filtering.
It's technically possible to automatically filter out items that
aren't using the default channel (i.e., `channel != nil`) in
`#items_from_content` but some casks use an unstable version, so we
can't do this internally. That is to say, we wouldn't be able to
override internal filtering in a `strategy` block, as any omitted
items wouldn't be provided to the block. Conversely, if we pass all
items to a `strategy` block, we can easily filter by channel there.
We haven't been filtering by channel internally and we've only found
one cask where this has been a problem, so it seems fine for now.
It's sometimes necessary to work with all the items in a Sparkle feed
to be able to correctly identify the newest version but livecheck's
`Sparkle` strategy only passes the `item` it views as newest into a
`strategy` block.
This updates the `Sparkle` strategy to optionally pass all items into
a `strategy` block, so we can manipulate them (e.g., filtering,
sorting). This is enabled by naming the first argument of the
strategy block `items` instead of `item`. `Sparkle` `strategy` blocks
where the first argument is `item` will continue to work as expected.
This necessarily updates `#item_from_content` (now
`items_from_content`) to return all items. I've decided to move the
sorting out of `#items_from_content`, so it simply returns the items
in the order they appear. If there is ever an exceptional situation
where we need the original order, this will technically allow for it.
The sorting has instead been moved into the `#versions_from_content`
method, to maintain the existing behavior. I thought about passing
the items into the `strategy` block in their original order but it
feels like sorting by default is the better approach for now (partly
from the perspective of maintaining existing behavior) and we can
always revisit this in the future if a cask ever requires the
original order.
Lastly, this expands the `Sparkle` tests to increase coverage. The
only untested parts are `#find_versions` (which currently
requires a network request) and a couple safeguard `raise` calls
when there's a `REXML::UndefinedNamespaceException` (which shouldn't
be encountered unless something is broken).
There are times where a regex isn't needed in a `strategy` block and
these changes explicitly handle that situation.
This allows the Symbol Proc format used in some `Sparkle` `livecheck`
blocks (e.g., `strategy :sparkle, &:version`) to continue working
instead of failing with a "wrong number of arguments (given 1,
expected 0)" error. This error would occur because a Symbol Proc only
only expects one argument (e.g., an `Item`, not an `Item` and a
regex/nil).
There's an argument to be made for avoiding the Symbol Proc format
for `strategy` blocks but I haven't found a way of selectively
disabling the Style/SymbolProc cop only for a `strategy` DSL method
call. That is to say, if we don't use the Symbol Proc format, `brew
style` will give a "Pass &:version as an argument to strategy instead
of a block." offense.
Besides that, this also replaces the `block` type signatures in
livecheck strategies with `T.untyped`. Sorbet doesn't know how to
handle a `Proc` with a variable number of arguments and can't be
taught how (i.e., `T.any` with a `Proc` signature for each variation
doesn't work). The aforementioned changes cause Sorbet to complain
about there being both too many and too few arguments, so the only
way to win is not to play the game. Hopefully we can restore the
`block` type signatures in the future (if upstream resolves this
years-old issue) but `T.untyped` seems to be our only option for now.
This modifies cask-related livecheck strategies to allow passing a
regex into a `strategy` block, when appropriate. These strategies
were outliers that explicitly rejected a regex even if a `strategy`
block was used, forcing any regex to be inlined in the `strategy`
block (instead of being defined using `#regex`).
With these changes, all `strategy` blocks will be able to accept a
regex, further simplifying the mental model. This also helps to
better align the various `find_versions` and `versions_from_*`
methods across strategies.
Valid `strategy` block return types currently vary between
strategies. Some only accept a string whereas others accept a string
or array of strings. [`strategy` blocks also accept a `nil` return
(to simplify early returns) but this was already standardized across
strategies.]
While some strategies only identify one version by default (where a
string is an appropriate return type), it could be that a strategy
block identifies more than one version. In this situation, the
strategy would need to be modified to accept (and work with) an
array from a `strategy` block.
Rather than waiting for this to become a problem, this modifies all
strategies to standardize on allowing `strategy` blocks to return a
string or array of strings (even if only one of these is currently
used in practice). Standardizing valid return types helps to further
simplify the mental model for `strategy` blocks and reduce cognitive
load.
This commit extracts related logic from `#find_versions` into
methods like `#versions_from_content`, which is conceptually similar
to `PageMatch#page_matches` (renamed to `#versions_from_content`
for consistency). This allows us to write tests for the related code
without having to make network requests (or stub them) at this point.
In general, this also helps to better align the structure of
strategies and how the various `#find_versions` methods work with
versions.
There's still more planned work to be done here but this is a step
in the right direction.
This inlines the `PRIORITY` and `#match?` logic from `PageMatch`
into `Sparkle` instead of subclassing `PageMatch`. `Sparkle` doesn't
really make sense as a subclass of `PageMatch` (since it functions
in a completely different manner), so it's better to simply copy
over these parts of `PageMatch`. This also helps to separate the
strategies, so any changes to `PRIORITY` or `#match?` in `PageMatch`
won't affect `Sparkle`.
