Follow up on `DownloadQueue` for download concurrency on `brew fetch`
and `brew install` to also add support for `brew reinstall` and
`brew upgrade`.
This required a fair bit of refactoring to make this work so I've also
made `install.rb`, `reinstall.rb` and `upgrade.rb` `typed: strict` to
add some extra guardrails from Sorbet here.
Co-authored-by: Carlo Cabrera <github@carlo.cab>
We recently added `POST` request support to livecheck but related cask
checks are failing the `livecheck_https_availability` audit because it
calls `validate_url_for_https_availability` which calls
`Utils::Curl.curl_check_http_content` and that checks the URL using a
`GET` request. Adding `POST` request support to all of those methods
will take some work, so this adds a guard to skip the audit if the
`livecheck` block uses `post_form` or `post_json`. This isn't ideal
but it will allow us to add these `livecheck` blocks in the interim
time.
Co-authored-by: Douglas Eichelberger <d@eic.email>
Formulae, casks, and resources have a `#livecheckable?` method that
indicates whether they contain a `livecheck` block. This is intended
to be read as "has a livecheckable?", not "is livecheckable?" (as
livecheck can find versions for some packages/resources without a
`livecheck` block). Unfortunately, correct understanding of this
method's behavior [outside of documentation] relies on historical
knowledge that few people possess, so this is often confusing to
anyone who hasn't been working on livecheck since 2020.
In the olden days, a "livecheckable" was a Ruby file containing a
`livecheck` block (originally a hash) with a filename that
corresponded to a related formula. The `livecheck` blocks in
livecheckable files were integrated into their respective formulae in
August 2020, so [first-party] livecheckables ceased to exist at that
time. From that point forward, we simply referred to these as
`livecheck` blocks.
With that in mind, this clarifies the situation by replacing
"livecheckable" language. This includes renaming `#livecheckable?` to
`#livecheck_defined?`, replacing usage of "livecheckable" as a noun
with "`livecheck` block", replacing "livecheckable" as a boolean with
"livecheck_defined", and replacing incorrect usage of "livecheckable"
as an adjective with "checkable".
The method only returned the executable name and not the full path,
leading to a swallowed error, because brew gracefully ignores a
failing lipo command.
Currently `brew audit` only audits the first binary in a cask.
For example the cask `wiso-steuer-2024` contains multiple binaries in
`Contents/MacOS`:
- `btssysteminfo`
- `whilfe`
- `wmain24`
The first binary (some telemetry tool) is not the main binary and not
a universal binary, but the other two are. Given that `wmain24` is
defined as the main binary in the `Contents/Info.plist`, brew probably
should audit that binary rather than just checking the first one.
- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
This improves the load time of most brew commands. For an example of
one of the simplest commands this speeds up:
Without Bootsnap:
```
$ hyperfine 'git checkout master; brew help' 'git checkout optimise_requires; brew help'
Benchmark 1: git checkout master; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 525.0 ms ± 35.8 ms [User: 229.9 ms, System: 113.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 465.3 ms … 576.6 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: git checkout optimise_requires; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 383.3 ms ± 25.1 ms [User: 133.0 ms, System: 72.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 353.0 ms … 443.6 ms 10 runs
Summary
git checkout optimise_requires; brew help ran
1.37 ± 0.13 times faster than git checkout master; brew help
```
With Bootsnap:
```
$ hyperfine 'git checkout master; brew help' 'git checkout optimise_requires; brew help'
Benchmark 1: git checkout master; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 386.0 ms ± 30.9 ms [User: 130.2 ms, System: 93.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 359.5 ms … 469.3 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: git checkout optimise_requires; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 330.2 ms ± 32.4 ms [User: 93.4 ms, System: 73.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 302.9 ms … 413.9 ms 10 runs
Summary
git checkout optimise_requires; brew help ran
1.17 ± 0.15 times faster than git checkout master; brew help
```
