- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
- Found with
`grep -rL "# typed: strict" Library/Homebrew | xargs grep -l "undef "`.
- This stops people from trying to bump them and
getting an error that they can't fix because
[it's a Sorbet limitation](https://sorbet.org/docs/error-reference#3008),
wasting contributor time.
- Add more early return checks
- Move to a recursive approach for more readability and avoiding a
counter that we need to bump
- Perform more caching
- Keep class variable usage isolated into specific methods
Right now this is done through the gcc@5 formula.
See 9692318ca6/Formula/gcc%405.rb (L33)
This is fragile because when we will migrate to gcc@11
we have to think about migrating the installation from one gcc formula to another..
Also, not having the right glibc version results in a non-functional brew
installation on an older Linux: the glibc installation needs
to be done by brew, and not by a workaround in a specific formula
Co-Authored-By: Mike McQuaid <mike@mikemcquaid.com>
Co-Authored-By: Bo Anderson <mail@boanderson.me>
Co-Authored-By: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
