This[^1] will enable us to start testing arm64 bottle builds in
Homebrew/core when this environment variable is set.
[^1]: Along with some tweaks to the `dispatch-build-bottle` workflow.
- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
- Found with
`grep -rL "# typed: strict" Library/Homebrew | xargs grep -l "undef "`.
- This stops people from trying to bump them and
getting an error that they can't fix because
[it's a Sorbet limitation](https://sorbet.org/docs/error-reference#3008),
wasting contributor time.
Fixes#13762.
There's still a bug in the GCC linkage check, but I'll need a bit more
time to work on a fix. This at least makes sure `brew doctor` will not
return the error in the issue linked above.
This complements my other two GCC-on-Linux PRs (#13631, #13633), however
they are both reliant on bottles eventually being (re-)poured.
Let's try to speed that up by returning an error message from `brew doctor`
whenever a user has formulae installed that would benefit from a `brew reinstall`.
