uses: restore formula-level exception handler
This is a temporary measure until: - #1862 is merged - I can a test on `brew uses` against every formula in the official taps to verify that exceptions are no longer raised.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b216798bb
commit
9475622c07
@ -47,49 +47,54 @@ module Homebrew
|
||||
|
||||
uses = formulae.select do |f|
|
||||
used_formulae.all? do |ff|
|
||||
if recursive
|
||||
deps = f.recursive_dependencies do |dependent, dep|
|
||||
if dep.recommended?
|
||||
Dependency.prune if ignores.include?("recommended?") || dependent.build.without?(dep)
|
||||
elsif dep.optional?
|
||||
Dependency.prune if !includes.include?("optional?") && !dependent.build.with?(dep)
|
||||
elsif dep.build?
|
||||
Dependency.prune unless includes.include?("build?")
|
||||
end
|
||||
begin
|
||||
if recursive
|
||||
deps = f.recursive_dependencies do |dependent, dep|
|
||||
if dep.recommended?
|
||||
Dependency.prune if ignores.include?("recommended?") || dependent.build.without?(dep)
|
||||
elsif dep.optional?
|
||||
Dependency.prune if !includes.include?("optional?") && !dependent.build.with?(dep)
|
||||
elsif dep.build?
|
||||
Dependency.prune unless includes.include?("build?")
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# If a tap isn't installed, we can't find the dependencies of one
|
||||
# its formulae, and an exception will be thrown if we try.
|
||||
if dep.is_a?(TapDependency) && !dep.tap.installed?
|
||||
Dependency.keep_but_prune_recursive_deps
|
||||
# If a tap isn't installed, we can't find the dependencies of one
|
||||
# its formulae, and an exception will be thrown if we try.
|
||||
if dep.is_a?(TapDependency) && !dep.tap.installed?
|
||||
Dependency.keep_but_prune_recursive_deps
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
reqs = f.recursive_requirements do |dependent, req|
|
||||
if req.recommended?
|
||||
Requirement.prune if ignores.include?("recommended?") || dependent.build.without?(req)
|
||||
elsif req.optional?
|
||||
Requirement.prune if !includes.include?("optional?") && !dependent.build.with?(req)
|
||||
elsif req.build?
|
||||
Requirement.prune unless includes.include?("build?")
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
else
|
||||
deps = f.deps.reject do |dep|
|
||||
ignores.any? { |ignore| dep.send(ignore) } && !includes.any? { |include| dep.send(include) }
|
||||
end
|
||||
reqs = f.requirements.reject do |req|
|
||||
ignores.any? { |ignore| req.send(ignore) } && !includes.any? { |include| req.send(include) }
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
reqs = f.recursive_requirements do |dependent, req|
|
||||
if req.recommended?
|
||||
Requirement.prune if ignores.include?("recommended?") || dependent.build.without?(req)
|
||||
elsif req.optional?
|
||||
Requirement.prune if !includes.include?("optional?") && !dependent.build.with?(req)
|
||||
elsif req.build?
|
||||
Requirement.prune unless includes.include?("build?")
|
||||
next true if deps.any? do |dep|
|
||||
begin
|
||||
dep.to_formula.full_name == ff.full_name
|
||||
rescue
|
||||
dep.name == ff.name
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
else
|
||||
deps = f.deps.reject do |dep|
|
||||
ignores.any? { |ignore| dep.send(ignore) } && !includes.any? { |include| dep.send(include) }
|
||||
end
|
||||
reqs = f.requirements.reject do |req|
|
||||
ignores.any? { |ignore| req.send(ignore) } && !includes.any? { |include| req.send(include) }
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
next true if deps.any? do |dep|
|
||||
begin
|
||||
dep.to_formula.full_name == ff.full_name
|
||||
rescue
|
||||
dep.name == ff.name
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
reqs.any? do |req|
|
||||
req.name == ff.name || [ff.name, ff.full_name].include?(req.default_formula)
|
||||
reqs.any? do |req|
|
||||
req.name == ff.name || [ff.name, ff.full_name].include?(req.default_formula)
|
||||
end
|
||||
rescue FormulaUnavailableError
|
||||
# Silently ignore this case as we don't care about things used in
|
||||
# taps that aren't currently tapped.
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user