audit: recognize options used with 'ARGV.flag?'
A few formula use ARGV.flag? instead of ARGV.include?. This made `audit` recognize a few undocumented instances of a '--devel' option, but we can just ignore that like '--HEAD' for now, and change the behavior if we decide they need to be documented explicitly in each formula. cf. Homebrew/homebrew#7456. Signed-off-by: Jack Nagel <jacknagel@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d817e5e51e
commit
51f010ac39
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ def audit_formula_options f, text
|
||||
|
||||
# Find possible options
|
||||
options = []
|
||||
text.scan(/ARGV\.include\?[ ]*\(?(['"])(.+?)\1/) { |m| options << m[1] }
|
||||
text.scan(/ARGV\.(include|flag)\?[ ]*\(?(['"])(.+?)\2/) { |m| options << m[2] }
|
||||
options.reject! {|o| o.include? "#"}
|
||||
options.uniq!
|
||||
|
||||
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ def audit_formula_options f, text
|
||||
|
||||
if options.length > 0
|
||||
options.each do |o|
|
||||
next if o == '--HEAD'
|
||||
next if o == '--HEAD' || o == '--devel'
|
||||
problems << " * Option #{o} is not documented" unless documented_options.include? o
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user