Use FormulaVersions
for checksum check.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ade62aa1b1
commit
330307b01a
@ -31,9 +31,6 @@
|
||||
#:
|
||||
#: If `--except-cops` is passed, the given Rubocop cop(s)' checks would be skipped.
|
||||
#:
|
||||
#: If `--commit-range` is is passed, the audited Formula will be compared to the
|
||||
#: last revision before the `<commit_range>`.
|
||||
#:
|
||||
#: `audit` exits with a non-zero status if any errors are found. This is useful,
|
||||
#: for instance, for implementing pre-commit hooks.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -651,25 +648,9 @@ class FormulaAuditor
|
||||
problem "Devel-only (no stable download)"
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
previous_formula_contents = unless formula.tap.nil?
|
||||
commit_range = ARGV.value("commit-range")
|
||||
Git.last_revision_of_file(formula.tap.path, formula.path, before_commit: commit_range)
|
||||
end
|
||||
previous_formula = unless (previous_formula_contents || "").empty?
|
||||
Formulary.from_contents(formula.name, formula.path, previous_formula_contents)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
%w[Stable Devel HEAD].each do |name|
|
||||
next unless spec = formula.send(name.downcase)
|
||||
|
||||
unless previous_formula.nil?
|
||||
previous_spec = previous_formula.send(name.downcase)
|
||||
|
||||
if previous_spec.version == spec.version && previous_spec.checksum != spec.checksum
|
||||
problem "#{name}: only sha256 changed; needs to be confirmed by the developer"
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
ra = ResourceAuditor.new(spec, online: @online, strict: @strict).audit
|
||||
problems.concat ra.problems.map { |problem| "#{name}: #{problem}" }
|
||||
|
||||
@ -765,6 +746,15 @@ class FormulaAuditor
|
||||
return if @new_formula
|
||||
|
||||
fv = FormulaVersions.new(formula)
|
||||
|
||||
previous_version_and_checksum = fv.previous_version_and_checksum("origin/master")
|
||||
[:stable, :devel].each do |spec_sym|
|
||||
next unless spec = formula.send(spec_sym)
|
||||
next unless previous_version_and_checksum[spec_sym][:version] == spec.version
|
||||
next if previous_version_and_checksum[spec_sym][:checksum] == spec.checksum
|
||||
problem "#{spec_sym}: only sha256 changed; needs to be confirmed by the developer"
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
attributes = [:revision, :version_scheme]
|
||||
attributes_map = fv.version_attributes_map(attributes, "origin/master")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -63,6 +63,26 @@ class FormulaVersions
|
||||
map
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def previous_version_and_checksum(branch)
|
||||
map = {}
|
||||
|
||||
rev_list(branch) do |rev|
|
||||
formula_at_revision(rev) do |f|
|
||||
[:stable, :devel].each do |spec_sym|
|
||||
next unless spec = f.send(spec_sym)
|
||||
map[spec_sym] ||= { version: spec.version, checksum: spec.checksum }
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
break if map[:stable] && map[:devel]
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
map[:stable] ||= {}
|
||||
map[:devel] ||= {}
|
||||
|
||||
map
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def version_attributes_map(attributes, branch)
|
||||
attributes_map = {}
|
||||
return attributes_map if attributes.empty?
|
||||
|
@ -643,9 +643,6 @@ With `--verbose` or `-v`, many commands print extra debugging information. Note
|
||||
|
||||
If `--except-cops` is passed, the given Rubocop cop(s)' checks would be skipped.
|
||||
|
||||
If `--commit-range` is is passed, the audited Formula will be compared to the
|
||||
last revision before the ``commit_range``.
|
||||
|
||||
`audit` exits with a non-zero status if any errors are found. This is useful,
|
||||
for instance, for implementing pre-commit hooks.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -674,9 +674,6 @@ If \fB\-\-only\-cops\fR is passed, only the given Rubocop cop(s)\' violations wo
|
||||
If \fB\-\-except\-cops\fR is passed, the given Rubocop cop(s)\' checks would be skipped\.
|
||||
.
|
||||
.IP
|
||||
If \fB\-\-commit\-range\fR is is passed, the audited Formula will be compared to the last revision before the \fB<commit_range>\fR\.
|
||||
.
|
||||
.IP
|
||||
\fBaudit\fR exits with a non\-zero status if any errors are found\. This is useful, for instance, for implementing pre\-commit hooks\.
|
||||
.
|
||||
.TP
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user