49 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			49 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
|   | # Maintainers: Avoiding Burnout
 | |||
|  | **This guide is for maintainers.** These special people have **write | |||
|  | access** to Homebrew’s repository and help merge the contributions of | |||
|  | others. You may find what is written here interesting, but it’s | |||
|  | definitely not for everyone. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | # 1. Use Homebrew
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Maintainers of Homebrew should be using it regularly. This is partly because | |||
|  | you won't be a good maintainer unless you can put yourself in the shoes of our | |||
|  | users but also because you may decide to stop using Homebrew and at that point | |||
|  | you should also decide not to be a maintainer and find other things to work on. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | # 2. No Guilt About Leaving
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | All maintainers can stop working on Homebrew at any time without any guilt or | |||
|  | explanation (like a job). We may still ask for your help with questions after | |||
|  | you leave but you are under no obligation to answer them. Like a job, if you | |||
|  | create a big mess and then leave you still have no obligations but we may think | |||
|  | less of you (or, realistically, probably just revert the problematic work). | |||
|  | Like a job, you should probably take a break from Homebrew at least a few times | |||
|  | a year. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | This also means contributors should be consumers. If an owner finds they are | |||
|  | not using a project in the real-world, they should reconsider their involvement | |||
|  | with the project. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | # 3. Prioritise Maintainers Over Users
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | It's important to be user-focused but ultimately, as long as you follow #1 | |||
|  | above, Homebrew's minimum number of users will be the number of maintainers. | |||
|  | However, if Homebrew has no maintainers it will quickly become useless to all | |||
|  | users and the project will die. As a result, no user complaint, behaviour or | |||
|  | need takes priority over the burnout of maintainers. If users do not like the | |||
|  | direction of the project, the easiest way to influence it is to make | |||
|  | significant, high-quality code contributions and become a maintainer. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | # 4. Learn To Say No
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Homebrew gets a lot of feature requests, non-reproducible bug reports, usage | |||
|  | questions and PRs we won't accept. These should be closed out as soon as we | |||
|  | realise that they aren't going to be resolved or merged. This is kinder than | |||
|  | deciding this after a long period of review. Our issue tracker should reflect | |||
|  | work to be done. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | --- | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Thanks to https://gist.github.com/ryanflorence/124070e7c4b3839d4573 which influenced this document |